Blog posts
Results of you search request.
Results of you search request.
In the course of the Birkenstock decision, this decision of the BPatG illustrates, on the one hand, the possibility of copyright as an earlier right
The decision of the Federal Patent Court (case no. 29 W (pat) 14/21) of 15 January 2025 deals with the issue of bad faith trademark
The ruling of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) of 20 February 2025 (I ZR 16/24) on the copyright protectability of the Birkenstock sandal models
In its judgement, the ECJ dealt with the interpretation of Article 24(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (Brussels Ia Regulation) in the context of patent
The ECJ recently provided more protection for trademark owners against parallel importers with three important decisions. In decisions C-147/20, C-224/20 and C-253/20, the question of
The Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) has commented on this in its decision T 844/18 (Crispr/Cas) and continues its previous line:
In its decision BPatG 30 W (pat) 809/18 of February 27, 2020, the German Federal Patent Court (BPatG) ruled on the question of the visibility
In its decision G 3/19 “Pepper” of 14 May 2020, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office decided that European patents will
+49 351 470 37 - 0
info@ku-patent.de
https://ku-patent.de/
© 2024 Kailuweit & Uhlemann Patentanwälte Partnerschaft mbB